New NIAID-supported science presented at the 2024 HIV Research for Prevention (HIVR4P) conference in Lima, Peru features a breadth of HIV discovery and translational findings and enriches the evidence base on HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) within the context of reproductive health. Select Institute-supported science highlights are summarized below. Full HIVR4P abstracts are posted on the official conference Web site.

Using PrEP Modalities Alongside Contraception and in the First Trimester of Pregnancy

The monthly dapivirine vaginal ring for HIV prevention was safe in cisgender women who used the ring during early pregnancy and then discontinued use as soon as they learned that they were pregnant. In a pre-licensure open-label study of the dapivirine vaginal ring, participants stopped using it if they became pregnant because ring use during pregnancy was beyond the scope of the study. Pregnant study participants remained enrolled after discontinuing the ring and were monitored for safety throughout their pregnancies. An analysis of data from 72 pregnancies found that there were no notable adverse effects among the participants or their infants when the ring was used in early pregnancy. These findings add to the growing evidence that the dapivirine vaginal ring is safe to use throughout pregnancy. Data presented from another study previously confirmed the safety of the ring when participants initiated use during the second trimester and continued to use it until delivery.

An analysis from the Phase 3 study of long-acting injectable cabotegravir (CAB-LA) PrEP in cisgender women found the drug did not interact with long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) drugs. A subset of study participants taking the LARCs etonogestrel, medroxyprogesterone acetate or norethindrone provided additional blood samples so that the study team could analyze how taking LARCs together with CAB-LA or oral PrEP with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) could affect the levels of the antiretroviral drugs and contraceptive agents in the body. There were no drug interactions between CAB-LA and any of the LARCs. Interaction between TDF/FTC and LARCs could not be determined because adherence to TDF/FTC was low in the participating cohort. CAB-LA and TDF/FTC were previously shown to be safe for use in pregnancy. 

Early-Stage Findings on HIV Vaccines to Produce HIV Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies

Several studies of germline targeting—a promising HIV vaccine strategy that stimulates the immune system to generate antibodies capable of neutralizing diverse HIV strains—reported results to inform the next stages of vaccine development. Findings in people and animal models showed that several immunogens—molecules used in a vaccine to elicit a specific immune system response—began to prompt immune responses that could generate HIV broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs). In one study of 53 participants without HIV, a vaccine containing a nanoparticle immunogen called 426.mod.core-C4b was safe at multiple dosing levels and appeared to generate B cells capable of producing bNAbs if stimulated further. These findings are informing the development of more advanced HIV vaccine concepts involving the 426.mod.core-C4b immunogen. 

Understanding the HIV Reservoir and HIV Remission Off Antiretroviral Therapy

HIV is difficult to cure because the virus is skilled at “hiding” in the body and can reappear in the blood stream shortly after antiretroviral therapy (ART) is stopped. These hiding places, called reservoirs, are unaffected by ART. NIAID-supported scientists are exploring strategies to clear HIV and its reservoirs from the body or to reduce HIV to levels that can be suppressed by a person’s own immune system. A new small study found that monocytes—a type of white blood cell—expressing a gene called interleukin 1 beta (IL1B) are associated with smaller HIV reservoirs after a person acquires HIV. Further understanding of the influence of IL1B on HIV reservoir size could guide future novel HIV remission strategies.

Clinical trials and animal studies of HIV remission approaches reported outcomes of interventions designed to maintain HIV viral suppression or remission after ART was paused. When ART is paused in an HIV remission study it is called an analytical treatment interruption (ATI). In one study, researchers infected 16 infant monkeys with the simian version of HIV (SHIV), then placed them into three different treatment groups, each including ART with various combinations of the investigational HIV drug leronlimab and the HIV bNAbs called PGT121-LS and VRC07-523-LS. After 27 weeks of treatment, the research team conducted an ATI and observed outcomes by treatment group. Animals that received ART and both HIV bNAbs experienced rapid rebound of detectable SHIV. Two of 6 animals that received ART and leronlimab remained free of detectable virus through 20 weeks after ATI. All of the animals that received ART, leronlimab and the two HIV bNAbs remained free of detectable virus at the time of abstract submission, 15 weeks after ATI. Monitoring and assessment of monkeys’ SHIV reservoirs is ongoing, and further studies are warranted to understand the effects observed, according to the authors.

Novel PrEP Implant Technology 

Available PrEP methods currently include oral pill, long-acting injectable, and controlled release vaginal ring formulations. A novel refillable controlled-release antiretroviral drug (ARV) implant was found to be safe and capable of delivering one or more ARVs. The implant, placed subdermally—just under the skin—was examined in monkeys and demonstrated that it could provide sustained release of the investigational ARVs islatravir and MK-8527 as well as the lenacapavir, which is licensed for ART and being studied for PrEP, and bictegravir and dolutegravir, both licensed for ART. Implants containing islatravir were evaluated for efficacy as PrEP and found to completely protect the animals from SHIV challenge—direct administration of the virus vaginally and rectally—through 29 months. The implant is being studied for delivery of ARVs for PrEP and ART.

HIV clinical research builds upon basic science discoveries, preclinical studies, and consultations with communities affected by HIV. Further, clinical research relies on the dedication of study participants and the people who support them. NIAID is grateful to all who contribute to advancing HIV research.

References

P Ehrenberg et al. Single-cell analyses reveal that monocyte gene expression impacts HIV-1 reservoir size in acutely treated cohorts. HIV Research for Prevention Conference. Tuesday, October 8, 2024.

W Hahn et al. Vaccination with a novel fractional escalating dose strategy improves early humoral responses with a novel germline targeting HIV vaccine (426.mod.core-C4b): preliminary results from HVTN 301. HIV Research for Prevention Conference. Wednesday, October 9, 2024. 

N. Haigwood et al. Short-term combination immunotherapy with broadly neutralizing antibodies and CCR5 blockade mediates ART-free viral control in infant rhesus macaques. HIV Research for Prevention Conference. Wednesday, October 9, 2024.

M Marzinke et al. Evaluation of potential pharmacologic interactions between CAB-LA or TDF/FTC and hormonal contraceptive agents: a tertiary analysis of HPTN 084. HIV Research for Prevention Conference. Thursday, October 10, 2024.

A Mayo et al. Pregnancy and infant outcomes among individuals exposed to dapivirine ring during the first trimester of pregnancy in the MTN-025/HOPE open-label extension trial. HIV Research for Prevention Conference. Thursday, October 10, 2024.

F Pons-Faudoa et al. Drug-agnostic transcutaneously-refillable subdermal implant for ultra-long-acting delivery of antiretrovirals for HIV prevention. HIV Research for Prevention Conference. Wednesday, October 9, 2024.

Discovery, Development and Delivery for an Increasingly Interconnected HIV Landscape 

By Carl Dieffenbach, Ph.D., director, Division of AIDS, NIAID

This blog is the third in a series about the future of NIAID's HIV clinical research enterprise. For more information, please visit the HIV Clinical Research Enterprise page.

The NIAID HIV clinical research enterprise has celebrated important scientific advances since awards were made to the current networks in 2020. These achievements include the culminating steps in decades of research that led to approval of the first generation of long-acting medications for HIV prevention—a milestone that raises the standard for any future antiretroviral drug development to levels unimaginable even a decade ago. Our research has highlighted opportunities to maintain the overall health of people with HIV throughout their lifespans. We continue to expand the boundaries of scientific innovation in pursuit of durable technologies that could hasten an end to the HIV pandemic, especially preventive vaccines and curative therapy. During the COVID-19 public health emergency, our networks stepped forward to deliver swift results that advanced vaccines and therapeutics within a year of the World Health Organization declaring the global pandemic, while maintaining progress on our HIV research agenda. The impact of this collective scientific progress is evident worldwide.

Together with my NIH colleagues, I express sincere gratitude to the leaders and staff of current clinical trials networks, our research and civil society partners, and most importantly, clinical study participants and their loved ones, for their enduring commitment to supporting science that changes lives.

As we do every seven years, we are at a point in the funding cycle when our Institute engages research partners, community representatives, and other public health stakeholders in a multidisciplinary evaluation of network progress toward short- and long-term scientific goals. This process takes account of knowledge gained since the networks were last funded and identifies essential course corrections based on the latest scientific and public health evidence and priorities. Subsequent NIAID HIV research investments will build on the conclusions of these discussions.

Looking to the future, we envision an HIV research enterprise that follows a logical evolution in addressing new scientific priorities informed by previous research progress. We will fund our next networks to align with updated research goals to take us through the end of 2034. The HIV research community’s outstanding infrastructure is the model for biomedical research. Now, our capacity must reflect an increasing interdependence across clinical practice areas and public health contexts. Our goals for the next networks are to:

• Maintain our support for core discovery and translational research to address gaps in biomedical HIV prevention and treatment, including a vaccine and therapeutic remission or cure. Our objective is to identify effective interventions that expand user choice and access, as well as improve quality of life across the lifespan;
• Provide the multidisciplinary leadership required to address the intersections between HIV and other diseases and conditions throughout the lifespan, including noncommunicable diseases, such as diabetes mellitus and substance use disorder, and infectious diseases that share health determinants with HIV, such tuberculosis and hepatitis;
• Compress protocol development and approval timelines for small and early-stage trials to enable more timely translation of research concepts to active studies; 
• Respond to discrete implementation science research questions as defined by our implementation counterparts, including federal partners at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Agency for International Development, agencies implementing the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, and other nongovernmental funders and implementing organizations worldwide;  
• Draw from nimble and effective partnerships at all levels to leverage the necessary combination of financial resources, scientific expertise, and community leadership and operational capacity to perform clinical research that is accessible to and representative of the populations most affected by HIV, especially people and communities that have been underserved in the HIV response; 
• Leverage our partners’ platforms if called on to close critical evidence gaps for pandemic response; and,
• Plan for impact by mapping clear pathways to rapid regulatory decisions, scalable production, and fair pricing before the start of any efficacy study.

Our shared goal is to produce tools and evidence to facilitate meaningful reductions in HIV incidence, morbidity and mortality globally. I invite you to continue sharing your thoughts with us to help shape the future of HIV clinical research, and to review the blogs on specialized topics that we will continue to post on the HIV Clinical Research Enterprise page in the coming weeks. Please share your feedback, comments, and questions at NextNIAIDHIVNetworks@mail.nih.gov. Submissions will be accepted through December 2024. 

The world of fungi includes a wide range of organisms, such as mushrooms, molds, and yeast, that are common outdoors in water, soil, and air; indoors on surfaces; and on our skin and inside our bodies. Although many fungi are helpful—or even delicious, like some mushrooms—there are many others which can cause disease. Some fungal infections are more common in people with weakened immune systems or hospitalized individuals, while other fungal infections can infect anyone, including otherwise healthy people. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), more than one billion people worldwide get a fungal infection each year. There are four main classes of antifungal drugs, and the rising rate of antimicrobial resistance is limiting and complicating existing treatment options. Currently, there are no approved vaccines to prevent fungal infections.

NIAID conducts and supports basic, translational, and clinical research to understand how fungal pathogens cause disease and how the immune system responds to infection. NIAID researchers are exploring how fungal susceptibility and infection impact the function of immune cells. The following are examples of ongoing clinical trials supported by NIAID through the investigator-initiated clinical trial funding mechanism investigating various aspects of fungal disease. 

Stewardship in AMR – Examining a shorter treatment course for children

Immunocompromised patients are at risk for the development of fungal infections. Hospitalized patients can get severe, often deadly, fungal diseases like candidemia, a bloodstream infection caused by the Candida fungus. According to the CDC, candidemia is one of the most common bloodstream infections in the U.S. with an estimated 25,000 cases each year. The current treatment guidelines for invasive candidemia recommend 14 days of antifungal therapy.  This guideline is based on expert opinion rather than comparative data and the optimal treatment duration remains unknown. NIAID-funded researchers Drs. William J. Steinbach and Brian T. Fisher are conducting a clinical trial (NCT05763251) to examine whether a shorter 7-day treatment strategy is just as safe and effective as current practice. This trial is only enrolling pediatric patients at the study-site hospitals with uncomplicated cases of candidemia. A shorter treatment would significantly reduce the burden of care on sick and recovering pediatric patients, allowing families to come home earlier from the hospital, and could help combat the rising rates of antimicrobial resistance. This is the first randomized control trial to explore the efficacy of a shorter course treatment for any invasive fungal disease. The trial is supported through NIAID grant funding R01 AI 170385. 

Cryptococcus neoformans contributing to HIV/AIDS-related mortality 

Cryptococcus neoformans is a fungal pathogen that can cause cryptococcal meningitis. Those most at risk are immunocompromised, such as people/persons living with HIV/AIDS. Although Antiretroviral therapy (ART) has significantly reduced the incidence of HIV/AIDS in the United States, regions of the world with limited access to ART are still seeing tens of thousands of cases. According to the CDC, each year an estimated 152,000 people living with HIV experience cases of cryptococcal meningitis, of which an estimated 112,000 deaths occur, most in sub-Saharan Africa. In the weeks prior to the onset of meningitis, the cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) is detectable in the blood and is a good predictor of meningitis and death. NIAID-funded researcher Dr. Radha Rajasingham is leading a clinical trial (NCT03002012) to examine whether the treatment combination of liposomal amphotericin (AmBisome) and fluconazole for those who receive a positive CrAg antigen test effectively prevents cryptococcal meningitis and death. Dr. Rajasingham’s lab at the University of Minnesota is dedicated to improving cryptococcal meningitis treatment strategies and outcomes for people/persons living with HIV/AIDS and is supported through NIAID grant funding U01 AI 174978 and R01 AI162181. 

Though these conditions can be severe, they are not the only fungal diseases of concern for NIAID. From aspergillosis to Valley Fever, NIAID is committed to researching new treatments, diagnostics, and preventative measures for a wide array of fungal diseases, especially in the face of rising antifungal resistance.

This blog is the second in a series about the future of NIAID's HIV clinical research enterprise. For more information, please visit the HIV Clinical Research Enterprise page.

The impact of clinical research is often measured by its outcomes. From trials that provide groundbreaking evidence of efficacy to those stopped early for futility, the end results of clinical trials shape practice and future research priorities. However, years of effort from scientists, study teams and study participants while a trial is underway are sometimes overshadowed by final study outcomes. In this regard, trial implementation requires clinical research sites’ operational excellence for the duration of a study. Access to relevant populations depends on the location of each clinical research site as well as investigators' and clinical care providers’ engagement with the local community and understanding of their needs and preferences. A high-functioning clinical research site anchored in the communities it works in and comprised of cohesive, well-integrated components is essential to producing high-quality outputs. 

Currently, NIAID supports four research networks as part of its HIV clinical research enterprise. The networks are made up of more than 100 clinical research sites, each with local experts, robust research infrastructure, and well-trained, cross-functional staff who maintain standardized procedures and quality controls aligned with their network.

Every seven years, NIAID engages research partners, community representatives, and other public health stakeholders in a multidisciplinary evaluation of network progress toward short- and long-term scientific goals. This process takes account of knowledge gained since the networks were last funded and identifies essential course corrections based on the latest scientific and public health evidence. Subsequent NIAID HIV research investments build on the conclusions of these discussions. This process includes examining the networks’ infrastructure model, which the Institute updates and refines to stay aligned with its scientific priorities. 

The HIV clinical trials network sites have made tremendous contributions to NIH’s scientific priorities by offering direct access to and consultation with populations most affected by HIV globally, and by delivering high-quality clinical research with strong connections to trusted community outreach platforms. Their approach to community engagement anchors clinical research sites beyond the scope of any individual study, and when possible, aligns scientific questions and study protocols based on local context. 

Since the start of the 2020 research network grant cycle, HIV clinical research sites have enrolled about 93,000 participants across 78 clinical trials in 25 countries. The networks were able to quickly pivot to support NIAID’s emerging infectious disease priority areas, including COVID-19 and mpox. Of the 93,000 participants since 2020, approximately 78,000 were enrolled into COVID-19 clinical trials sponsored by NIAID’s Division of AIDS. 

Clinical trials sites currently operate with a hub-and-spoke model, with each hub providing centralized support to their linked clinical research sites. This model leverages shared resources where possible and practical, and ensures robust oversight to promote high-quality clinical trial operations. Hubs provide infrastructure and services including laboratory, pharmacy, regulatory, data management, and training to support execution of NIAID-sponsored clinical research. 

Future networks will need to maintain core strengths of current models while expanding capacity in areas vital to further scientific progress. These include operations that inform pandemic responses and extending our reach within communities impacted by HIV, including populations historically underrepresented in clinical research. Additionally, there may be opportunities for clinical research sites and other partners to conduct implementation science research based on their capacity and access to relevant populations in the context of specific scientific questions. 

Make seamless progress on established and emerging scientific priorities

Our goals include maintaining the strength and flexibility of our current network model and infrastructure to support established scientific priorities that improve the practice of medicine, including high-impact registrational trials to identify new biomedical interventions and support changes to product labelling. The networks also must remain capable of directing operations to generate evidence on interventions for pandemic responses. 

Engage underserved populations for more representative studies 

Building on its current reach, NIAID and its partners have identified opportunities to expand or strengthen our connections to medically underserved populations affected by HIV, and to increase representation of geographic areas with limited access to current clinical trials sites. We also are seeking clinical research sites with longstanding community relationships and experience conducting randomized clinical trials that include Black gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men, transgender people, people who sell sex, people who use drugs, and adolescent girls and young women, as well as populations in African countries with a high HIV prevalence. 

Integrate implementation science within clinical research practice

Implementation science is the scientific study of methods and strategies that facilitate the uptake of evidence-based practice and research into regular use by practitioners and policymakers. As biomedical HIV prevention, treatment, and diagnostic options expand, our scientific questions must expand to address not only whether an intervention works, but how it can be delivered to offer health care choices that people need, want and are able to use. This expanded scientific scope calls for research sites to have a diverse reach and skill sets, including experience and capacity for conducting implementation science research and fostering and maintaining partnerships with organizations that conduct implementation science research on key topics and interventions on which implementers seek stronger evidence.

The research community plays an essential role in shaping NIAID’s scientific direction and research enterprise operations. We want to hear from you. Please share your questions and comments at NextNIAIDHIVNetworks@mail.nih.gov.

About NIAID’s HIV Clinical Trials Networks

The clinical trials networks are supported through grants from NIAID, with co-funding from and scientific partnerships with NIH’s National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institute on Aging, and other NIH institutes and centers. There are four networks—Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections, the HIV Vaccine Trials Network, the HIV Prevention Trials Network, and the International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Network.

This blog is the first in a series about the future of NIAID's HIV clinical research enterprise. For more information, please visit the HIV Clinical Research Enterprise page.

NIAID supports four research networks as part of its HIV clinical research enterprise. Every seven years, the Institute engages research partners, community representatives, and other public health stakeholders in a multidisciplinary evaluation of network progress toward short- and long-term scientific goals. This process takes account of knowledge gained since the networks were last funded and identifies essential course corrections based on the latest scientific and public health evidence. Subsequent NIAID HIV research investments build on the conclusions of these discussions.

Pregnancy, childbirth and the postnatal period are a key focus of NIAID HIV research and call for measures to support the health of people who could become pregnant as well as their infants. Biological changes and social dynamics such as gender inequality, intimate partner violence, and discrimination can increase the likelihood of HIV acquisition during all natal stages. Of note, breastfeeding/chestfeeding is emerging as the predominant mode of vertical HIV transmission. NIAID is committed to optimizing HIV treatment and prevention options for people who might become pregnant, people who are pregnant and lactating, newborns, and young children who are still nursing or are living with HIV. Our goals are to offer safe, effective, acceptable, and accessible tools that provide evidence-based HIV prevention choices throughout the period of reproductive potential; prevent vertical HIV transmission to infants; and enable infants born with HIV to experience long periods of HIV remission or complete HIV clearance. We think these goals can be reached with discovery and development studies to advance biomedical interventions, and implementation science to rapidly introduce state-of-the-art interventions where they are needed most urgently.

In the current evaluation of our clinical trials networks, NIAID and other stakeholders are assessing novel interventions to interrupt the unacceptably high rate of new pediatric HIV diagnoses that persist in high burden countries. Recent research is rapidly expanding the evidence base for treatment for children and pregnant people with HIV, as well as biomedical prevention tools for pregnant people and people of reproductive potential who stand to benefit from their use. Some key advances include: 

• Expanded evidence to support a cascade of multiple regulatory approvals making new therapeutic agents available to the youngest children with HIV;
• Demonstrated safety of prevention products and antiretroviral therapy (ART) throughout pregnancy, including long-acting cabotegravir for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP); the controlled-release vaginal ring for HIV PrEP; and integrase strand transfer inhibitor-based ART for viral suppression in people with HIV; and
• Rigorous examination of the potential of treatment initiation within hours of birth to enable ART-free HIV remission in children in a research setting.

Together, these advances open doors to improved tools for HIV prevention and treatment and help define remaining evidence gaps and research needs.

Biomedical research to accelerate evidence responsive to pediatric and perinatal needs 

As noted above, a NIAID-sponsored clinical trial led by the International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Network (IMPAACT), called IMPAACT P1115, found that four children surpassed a year of HIV remission after pausing ART. The protocol remains active with subsequent iterations of the trial in children receiving more advanced ART regimens and novel broadly neutralizing antibody-based therapy. Further research is planned to identify biomarkers to predict the likelihood of HIV remission or rebound following ART interruption. Additional studies also are needed to better understand the mechanisms by which neonatal immunity and very early ART initiation limited the formation of latent HIV reservoirs to drive the original P1115 results.

Additional research priorities include developing early infant HIV testing assays that can promptly detect vertical HIV acquisition through breastfeeding/chestfeeding; wider examination of the safety and efficacy of presumptive ART pending an HIV diagnosis; administration of very early neonatal and pediatric formulations of the latest and future generations of long-acting ARVs for prevention and treatment and antibody-based therapy; and optimization of long-acting HIV treatment regimens to support health through periods of reproductive potential, pregnancy, and lactation.    

Implementation science to strengthen delivery 

Improving HIV prevention and care through reproductive years and intense early-life HIV intervention for infants will require an unprecedented level of reproductive health, prenatal, postnatal and pediatric HIV service integration. Several key clinical and operational questions warrant investigation through implementation science. The first is assuring availability of acceptable HIV testing modalities pre-conception, as well as universal HIV testing as part of routine obstetric care, and then supporting access to a person’s preferred PrEP method or ART based on HIV status. For infants whose birthing parent has HIV, we need evidence-based models for offering very early point-of-care infant HIV diagnosis and treatment, including presumptive ART for infants exposed to HIV in utero pending confirmatory testing. We also need to understand how to better support continued engagement in care to maintain viral suppression for childbearing people with HIV through the end of the lactating period and life course. We will provide special consideration for the preferences of adolescent and young adult cisgender women who are disproportionately affected by HIV in high burden settings globally. Defining local and contextually appropriate adaptations of successful models will be paramount for successful uptake. 

The research community plays an essential role in shaping NIAID’s scientific direction and research enterprise operations. We want to hear from you. Please share your questions and comments at NextNIAIDHIVNetworks@mail.nih.gov.

About NIAID Clinical Trials Networks and Pediatric HIV

The IMPAACT Network examines prevention and treatment interventions for HIV, HIV-associated complications, and related pathogens in infants, children, and adolescents, and during pregnancy and postpartum periods. The Network is supported through grants from NIAID, with co-funding and scientific partnership from the NIH Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the NIH National Institute of Mental Health. Three other networks—the HIV Vaccine Trials Network, HIV Prevention Trials Network, and Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections—generate complementary evidence and provide research infrastructure where needed when rapidly evolving prevention and treatment science has implications for IMPAACT priority populations. 

Editorial note: NIAID encourages the use of inclusive language in all communications. The terms related to lactation and pregnancy in this blog reflect the diverse gender identities and experiences of all people who stand to benefit from HIV prevention and cure research. For more information on inclusive language related to pregnancy and family, please visit the NIAID HIV Language Guide.