This blog is the second in a series about the future of NIAID's HIV clinical research enterprise. For more information, please visit the /research/hiv-research-enterprise page.

The impact of clinical research is often measured by its outcomes. From trials that provide groundbreaking evidence of efficacy to those stopped early for futility, the end results of clinical trials shape practice and future research priorities. However, years of effort from scientists, study teams and study participants while a trial is underway are sometimes overshadowed by final study outcomes. In this regard, trial implementation requires clinical research sites’ operational excellence for the duration of a study. Access to relevant populations depends on the location of each clinical research site as well as investigators' and clinical care providers’ engagement with the local community and understanding of their needs and preferences. A high-functioning clinical research site anchored in the communities it works in and comprised of cohesive, well-integrated components is essential to producing high-quality outputs. 

Currently, NIAID supports four research networks as part of its HIV clinical research enterprise. The networks are made up of more than 100 clinical research sites, each with local experts, robust research infrastructure, and well-trained, cross-functional staff who maintain standardized procedures and quality controls aligned with their network.

Every seven years, NIAID engages research partners, community representatives, and other public health stakeholders in a multidisciplinary evaluation of network progress toward short- and long-term scientific goals. This process takes account of knowledge gained since the networks were last funded and identifies essential course corrections based on the latest scientific and public health evidence. Subsequent NIAID HIV research investments build on the conclusions of these discussions. This process includes examining the networks’ infrastructure model, which the Institute updates and refines to stay aligned with its scientific priorities. 

The HIV clinical trials network sites have made tremendous contributions to NIH’s scientific priorities by offering direct access to and consultation with populations most affected by HIV globally, and by delivering high-quality clinical research with strong connections to trusted community outreach platforms. Their approach to community engagement anchors clinical research sites beyond the scope of any individual study, and when possible, aligns scientific questions and study protocols based on local context. 

Since the start of the 2020 research network grant cycle, HIV clinical research sites have enrolled about 93,000 participants across 78 clinical trials in 25 countries. The networks were able to quickly pivot to support NIAID’s emerging infectious disease priority areas, including COVID-19 and mpox. Of the 93,000 participants since 2020, approximately 78,000 were enrolled into COVID-19 clinical trials sponsored by NIAID’s Division of AIDS. 

Clinical trials sites currently operate with a hub-and-spoke model, with each hub providing centralized support to their linked clinical research sites. This model leverages shared resources where possible and practical, and ensures robust oversight to promote high-quality clinical trial operations. Hubs provide infrastructure and services including laboratory, pharmacy, regulatory, data management, and training to support execution of NIAID-sponsored clinical research. 

Future networks will need to maintain core strengths of current models while expanding capacity in areas vital to further scientific progress. These include operations that inform pandemic responses and extending our reach within communities impacted by HIV, including populations historically underrepresented in clinical research. Additionally, there may be opportunities for clinical research sites and other partners to conduct implementation science research based on their capacity and access to relevant populations in the context of specific scientific questions. 

Make seamless progress on established and emerging scientific priorities

Our goals include maintaining the strength and flexibility of our current network model and infrastructure to support established scientific priorities that improve the practice of medicine, including high-impact registrational trials to identify new biomedical interventions and support changes to product labelling. The networks also must remain capable of directing operations to generate evidence on interventions for pandemic responses. 

Engage underserved populations for more representative studies 

Building on its current reach, NIAID and its partners have identified opportunities to expand or strengthen our connections to medically underserved populations affected by HIV, and to increase representation of geographic areas with limited access to current clinical trials sites. We also are seeking clinical research sites with longstanding community relationships and experience conducting randomized clinical trials that include Black gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men, transgender people, people who sell sex, people who use drugs, and adolescent girls and young women, as well as populations in African countries with a high HIV prevalence. 

Integrate implementation science within clinical research practice

Implementation science is the scientific study of methods and strategies that facilitate the uptake of evidence-based practice and research into regular use by practitioners and policymakers. As biomedical HIV prevention, treatment, and diagnostic options expand, our scientific questions must expand to address not only whether an intervention works, but how it can be delivered to offer health care choices that people need, want and are able to use. This expanded scientific scope calls for research sites to have a diverse reach and skill sets, including experience and capacity for conducting implementation science research and fostering and maintaining partnerships with organizations that conduct implementation science research on key topics and interventions on which implementers seek stronger evidence.

The research community plays an essential role in shaping NIAID’s scientific direction and research enterprise operations. We want to hear from you. Please share your questions and comments at Next NIAID HIV Networks.

About NIAID’s HIV Clinical Trials Networks

The clinical trials networks are supported through grants from NIAID, with co-funding from and scientific partnerships with NIH’s National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institute on Aging, and other NIH institutes and centers. There are four networks—Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections, the HIV Vaccine Trials Network, the HIV Prevention Trials Network, and the International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Network.

This blog is the first in a series about the future of NIAID's HIV clinical research enterprise. For more information, please visit the HIV Clinical Research Enterprise page.

NIAID supports four research networks as part of its HIV clinical research enterprise. Every seven years, the Institute engages research partners, community representatives, and other public health stakeholders in a multidisciplinary evaluation of network progress toward short- and long-term scientific goals. This process takes account of knowledge gained since the networks were last funded and identifies essential course corrections based on the latest scientific and public health evidence. Subsequent NIAID HIV research investments build on the conclusions of these discussions.

Pregnancy, childbirth and the postnatal period are a key focus of NIAID HIV research and call for measures to support the health of people who could become pregnant as well as their infants. Biological changes and social dynamics such as gender inequality, intimate partner violence, and discrimination can increase the likelihood of HIV acquisition during all natal stages. Of note, breastfeeding/chestfeeding is emerging as the predominant mode of vertical HIV transmission. NIAID is committed to optimizing HIV treatment and prevention options for people who might become pregnant, people who are pregnant and lactating, newborns, and young children who are still nursing or are living with HIV. Our goals are to offer safe, effective, acceptable, and accessible tools that provide evidence-based HIV prevention choices throughout the period of reproductive potential; prevent vertical HIV transmission to infants; and enable infants born with HIV to experience long periods of HIV remission or complete HIV clearance. We think these goals can be reached with discovery and development studies to advance biomedical interventions, and implementation science to rapidly introduce state-of-the-art interventions where they are needed most urgently.

In the current evaluation of our clinical trials networks, NIAID and other stakeholders are assessing novel interventions to interrupt the unacceptably high rate of new pediatric HIV diagnoses that persist in high burden countries. Recent research is rapidly expanding the evidence base for treatment for children and pregnant people with HIV, as well as biomedical prevention tools for pregnant people and people of reproductive potential who stand to benefit from their use. Some key advances include: 

• Expanded evidence to support a cascade of multiple regulatory approvals making new therapeutic agents available to the youngest children with HIV;
• Demonstrated safety of prevention products and antiretroviral therapy (ART) throughout pregnancy, including long-acting cabotegravir for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP); the controlled-release vaginal ring for HIV PrEP; and integrase strand transfer inhibitor-based ART for viral suppression in people with HIV; and
• Rigorous examination of the potential of treatment initiation within hours of birth to enable ART-free HIV remission in children in a research setting.

Together, these advances open doors to improved tools for HIV prevention and treatment and help define remaining evidence gaps and research needs.

Biomedical research to accelerate evidence responsive to pediatric and perinatal needs 

As noted above, a NIAID-sponsored clinical trial led by the International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Network (IMPAACT), called IMPAACT P1115, found that four children surpassed a year of HIV remission after pausing ART. The protocol remains active with subsequent iterations of the trial in children receiving more advanced ART regimens and novel broadly neutralizing antibody-based therapy. Further research is planned to identify biomarkers to predict the likelihood of HIV remission or rebound following ART interruption. Additional studies also are needed to better understand the mechanisms by which neonatal immunity and very early ART initiation limited the formation of latent HIV reservoirs to drive the original P1115 results.

Additional research priorities include developing early infant HIV testing assays that can promptly detect vertical HIV acquisition through breastfeeding/chestfeeding; wider examination of the safety and efficacy of presumptive ART pending an HIV diagnosis; administration of very early neonatal and pediatric formulations of the latest and future generations of long-acting ARVs for prevention and treatment and antibody-based therapy; and optimization of long-acting HIV treatment regimens to support health through periods of reproductive potential, pregnancy, and lactation.    

Implementation science to strengthen delivery 

Improving HIV prevention and care through reproductive years and intense early-life HIV intervention for infants will require an unprecedented level of reproductive health, prenatal, postnatal and pediatric HIV service integration. Several key clinical and operational questions warrant investigation through implementation science. The first is assuring availability of acceptable HIV testing modalities pre-conception, as well as universal HIV testing as part of routine obstetric care, and then supporting access to a person’s preferred PrEP method or ART based on HIV status. For infants whose birthing parent has HIV, we need evidence-based models for offering very early point-of-care infant HIV diagnosis and treatment, including presumptive ART for infants exposed to HIV in utero pending confirmatory testing. We also need to understand how to better support continued engagement in care to maintain viral suppression for childbearing people with HIV through the end of the lactating period and life course. We will provide special consideration for the preferences of adolescent and young adult cisgender women who are disproportionately affected by HIV in high burden settings globally. Defining local and contextually appropriate adaptations of successful models will be paramount for successful uptake. 

The research community plays an essential role in shaping NIAID’s scientific direction and research enterprise operations. We want to hear from you. Please share your questions and comments at Next NIAID HIV Networks.

About NIAID Clinical Trials Networks and Pediatric HIV

The IMPAACT Network examines prevention and treatment interventions for HIV, HIV-associated complications, and related pathogens in infants, children, and adolescents, and during pregnancy and postpartum periods. The Network is supported through grants from NIAID, with co-funding and scientific partnership from the NIH Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the NIH National Institute of Mental Health. Three other networks—the HIV Vaccine Trials Network, HIV Prevention Trials Network, and Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections—generate complementary evidence and provide research infrastructure where needed when rapidly evolving prevention and treatment science has implications for IMPAACT priority populations. 

Editorial note: NIAID encourages the use of inclusive language in all communications. The terms related to lactation and pregnancy in this blog reflect the diverse gender identities and experiences of all people who stand to benefit from HIV prevention and cure research. For more information on inclusive language related to pregnancy and family, please visit the NIAID HIV Language Guide.  

NIAID-supported Clinical Studies Assess Therapeutics for Clearance of HIV from the Reservoir

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) has been a game-changer for people with HIV. But HIV is skilled at “hiding” and can reappear in the blood stream shortly after ART is stopped. That’s why NIAID and partners are investigating strategies to completely clear HIV from a person’s body, effectively curing them, or to reduce it to levels that can be suppressed by their own immune systems. 

Many promising HIV cure strategies use broadly neutralizing antibodies, or bNAbs, which can neutralize a wide range of HIV variants, homing in on and binding to specific viral components, and then acting to destroy the virus by triggering an immune response. Several HIV bNAbs have been developed and tested to determine whether they can prevent or treat HIV. NIAID and partners are evaluating bNAb-based strategies alone and in combination with other immunity-enhancing strategies for HIV clearance in clinical trials in Africa, North and South America, and Southeast Asia.

Finding a cure for HIV is complex, largely due to the tenacity of the virus—it can persist in some tissues or cells without being attacked by the immune system. This is even the case for people whose viral load—the amount of virus in the blood—is suppressed below a level that can be detected by routine diagnostic tools. As a result, most people who experience an interruption in treatment will experience a viral rebound, in which the previously dormant virus begins to replicate and can attack the immune system. This problem is especially urgent for people with HIV who have limited access to treatment, including those in areas with limited resources. A treatment that can be given for a limited time to stop the virus from replicating long term, or one that removes it from the body entirely, could eliminate the need for lifelong treatment, improve quality of life for people with HIV, and reduce further HIV transmission.  

Two studies beginning this summer are assessing the use of bNAbs to enable HIV remission in people with HIV in African countries. Both studies will include closely monitored ART interruption to examine whether bNAbs can lead to long-term ART-free control of HIV. One trial, called Pausing Antiretroviral Treatment Under Structured Evaluation (PAUSE), enrolled its first participant in June 2024 and continues to enroll people with HIV in Botswana, Malawi, and South Africa. Participants on ART with no detectable virus in their blood stream will receive two long-acting bNAbs (3BNC117-LS-J and 10-1074-LS-J) and then pause ART to determine whether the bNAbs are sufficient to control HIV in the body when ART is stopped. 

A second study, called Antiretrovirals Combined With Antibodies for HIV-1 Cure In Africa (ACACIA), is starting soon and will examine the bNAbs 3BNC117-LS (also known as teropavimab) and 10-1074-LS (also known as zinlirvimab) in adults living with HIV in Botswana, Malawi, South Africa and Zimbabwe who are beginning ART. The bNAbs will be given while there is still virus in the blood stream to see if they can enhance the body’s immune response to HIV, which could reduce the amount of virus that hides in viral reservoirs in the body. Once the bNAbs are no longer present in the body, ART will be interrupted for each participant, and they will be evaluated to determine how long viral suppression is maintained without ART and whether the bNAbs affect the immune response to HIV.

Researchers are also evaluating bNAb-based HIV cure strategies in children through the International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials (IMPAACT) Network. The IMPAACT P1115 study has examined very early HIV treatment strategies in infants who were exposed to or acquired HIV before birth. The study is assessing VRC01 and VRC07-523LS to see whether these bNAbs, when given with ART early in life, may enable ART-free remission in children. Another study, IMPAACT 2042, will evaluate the use of three bNAbs, VRC07-523LS, PGDM1400LS, and PGT121.414.LS, in children and young adults with HIV between the ages of 2 and 25 to determine whether the bNAbs can be part of a strategy to suppress HIV and clear the virus from the body.

Other clinical studies are combining bNAbs with therapeutic vaccines for HIV clearance. These vaccines are designed to improve the immune response to the virus in a person with HIV. ACTG A5374, which enrolled its first participant in early 2024, is evaluating the bNAbs teropavimab and zinlirvimab in combination with the therapeutic vaccines ChAdOx1.HIV cons1/62 and MVA.HIV cons3/4 and an immune booster called vesatolimod. The trial will assess the safety of the regimen in people with HIV in the U.S. and Brazil, and whether the combination can eliminate cells harboring HIV and prevent viral reservoirs from reactivating when ART is interrupted. 

The findings from these and related trials will provide researchers with new insights into how to effectively treat HIV or clear the virus from people’s bodies. This work is implemented by leveraging the strengths of all of the NIH-funded HIV clinical trials networks and collaborating institutions. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is co-funding PAUSE and ACACIA. IMPAACT P1115 and 2042 are co-funded by the NIH’s Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

The bNAbs VRC01 and VRC07-523LS were developed by NIAID’s Vaccine Research Center and Division of Intramural Research. The bNAbs 3BNC117 and 10-1074 were discovered by researchers at the Rockefeller University, funded in part by NIAID. PGT121.414.LS and PGDM1400LS are being developed by NIAID and collaborators.

Additional information about the trials: 

• ACTG A5374: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT067071767.
• ACTG A5416 (also called PAUSE): ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT06031272.
• ACTG A5417 (also called ACACIA): ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT06205602.
• IMPAACT P1115: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02140255. (Recent P1115 findings were presented at the 2024 Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections.)
• IMPAACT 2042 (also called Tatelo Plus): ClinicalTrials.gov ID coming soon.

NIAID Raises Awareness to Malaria-like Diseases in W. Africa

Dengue, Zika, Chikungunya Viruses in Mali; Disease Likely Misdiagnosed

NIAID scientists and colleagues have identified dengue, Zika and chikungunya viruses in the West African country of Mali, where health care providers likely misdiagnose patients with illness from those viruses due to unavailable diagnostic tools. Because malaria is the most common fever-causing illness in rural sub-Saharan Africa, most medical workers presume patients with a fever have malaria. The primary cause of all four infectious diseases is a mosquito bite.

Records from the Malian Health Information System show that about one-third of all patient visits to health care facilities are related to malaria, with 2.37 million clinical cases.

A new study from NIAID’s Rocky Mountain Laboratories and the University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies in Mali aims to help spread information to medical workers about the existence of the additional viral diseases. Ideally, circulating the information will help them obtain the necessary diagnostics.

The study, published in The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, involved 600 residents, 200 from each of the southern Malian communities of Soromba, Bamba and Banzana. The scientists detected antibodies to dengue virus in the blood of 77.2% of the residents tested; to Zika virus in 31.2%, and to chikungunya virus in 25.8%. They detected at least one of the three viruses in 84.9% of participants, meaning just 15.1% tested negative to any of the three viruses.

Evidence of the parasites that cause malaria was found in 44.5% of those tested. Unlike malaria, however, where most cases are found in children under age 14, residents over age 50 were most likely to have been exposed to dengue, Zika or chikungunya viruses. 

“Despite the high exposure risk to dengue virus in southern Mali, dengue fever cases have rarely been reported,” the researchers write. “This is likely due to the lack of diagnostic testing and the biased clinical focus on malaria in the region. Awareness of dengue virus as a cause of febrile illness needs to be urgently established in medical communities as an important public health measure.”

The scientists are hoping data from a more in-depth clinical study that just ended will provide additional details about the prevalence of these viruses in Mali. They also are planning to examine patients who have undiagnosed fevers to establish infection rates.

NIAID scientists are investigating dengue, Zika and chikungunya viruses to try and develop preventive and therapeutic treatment options, none of which exist.

Reference: S Bane, et al. Seroprevalence of Arboviruses in a Malaria Hyperendemic Area in Southern Mali. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.23-0803 (2024).

An HIV drug that suppresses the activity of the CCR5 receptor—a collection of proteins on the surface of certain immune cells—was associated with better renal function in kidney transplant recipients with HIV compared to people who took a placebo in a randomized trial. Study participants taking the drug, called maraviroc, also experienced lower rates of transplant rejection than those taking placebo, but the difference was not statistically significant due to lower-than-expected rejection rates across the entire study population. The findings of the NIAID-sponsored trial were presented today at the 2024 American Transplant Congress in Philadelphia. 

The CCR5 receptor helps HIV enter CD4+ T cells. Some people have a genetic mutation that prevents the CCR5 receptor from working, and either cannot acquire HIV or experience slower HIV-related disease progression if living with the virus. It has separately been observed that people with the same CCR5 genetic mutation have better outcomes following kidney and liver transplantation. The CCR5 antagonist class of antiretroviral drugs was developed to mimic the naturally occurring CCR5 mutation and is a well tolerated component of HIV treatment, but the drugs have not been evaluated as an intervention to improve transplantation outcomes in people. Furthermore, transplant recipients with HIV more frequently experience transplant rejection and elevated CCR5 activity than transplant recipients without HIV.

A research team led by the University of California San Francisco conducted a U.S.-based Phase 2 trial to assess the safety and tolerability of the CCR5 antagonist maraviroc given daily from the time of transplant onward among kidney transplant recipients, and to compare renal function of people taking daily maraviroc to those taking a placebo one year (52 weeks) post-transplant. All study participants were living with HIV and were virally suppressed on antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens. The study randomized 97 participants to receive maraviroc or a placebo in addition to their continued ART regimens post-transplant. Of them, only 27 participants were able to complete all necessary study examinations through 52 weeks due to logistical complications from the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. At one-year post-transplant, the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate—a measure of how well kidneys were working—was significantly higher in participants receiving maraviroc in addition to their ART regimen compared with participants receiving ART and placebo (59.2 versus 49.3 mL/min/1.73m²). The drug was safe and well tolerated. 

Four of the 49 participants taking maraviroc and 6 of the 48 participants taking placebo experienced transplant rejection, but this difference was not statistically significant given the relatively small sample size. Transplant rejection rates were lower than expected across both study groups, which the study team suggests may be a favorable outcome of the ART regimens most participants were taking. 

The addition of maraviroc significantly improved renal function in kidney transplant recipients with HIV compared to placebo. According to the authors, these findings warrant further exploration of the benefit of CCR5 antagonists in all kidney transplant recipients regardless of HIV status.

For more information about this study, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov and use the identifier NCT02741323.

Reference:

Brown et al. Beneficial Impact of CCR5 Blockade in Kidney Transplant Recipients with HIV. American Transplant Congress in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Tuesday, June 4, 2024.